Barack Obama has launched a long-awaited plan to close the detention centre at Guantanamo Bay, saying the site undermines national security and American values.
Mr Obama said the site in Cuba is counter-productive in the fight against terrorism because it is used as propaganda to recruit terrorists and drains military resources.
The White House released Mr Obama's proposal to close the facility on Tuesday, but it faces stiff opposition from the Republican-led Congress.
The plan makes a financial argument for closing the controversial detention centre in Cuba. US officials say it calls for up to 475 million dollars (£337 million) in construction costs that would ultimately be offset by as much as 180 million dollars (£128 million) per year in operating cost savings.
The proposal is part of Mr Obama's last effort to make good on his unfulfilled 2008 campaign vow to close Guantanamo and persuade policymakers to allow the Defence Department to move nearly 60 detainees to the US.
But with few specifics, the proposal may only further antagonise policymakers who have repeatedly passed legislation banning any effort to move detainees to the US.
US officials say the plan considers, but does not name, 13 locations in the US, including seven existing prison facilities in Colorado, South Carolina and Kansas, as well as six other locations on military bases.
They say the plan does not recommend a preferred site and the cost estimates are meant to provide a starting point for a conversation with Congress.
The seven facilities reviewed by a Pentagon assessment team last year were the US Disciplinary Barracks and Midwest Joint Regional Corrections Facility at Leavenworth, Kansas; the Consolidated Naval Brig, Charleston, South Carolina; the Federal Correctional Complex, which includes the medium, maximum and supermax facilities in Florence, Colorado; and the Colorado State Penitentiary II in Canon City, Colorado, also known as the Centennial Correctional Facility.
According to the officials, the US facilities would cost between 265 million dollars (£188 million) and 305 million dollars (£216 million) to operate each year. The annual operating cost for Guantanamo is 445 million dollars (£316 million).
More detailed spending figures, which are considered classified, will be provided to Congress, said the officials.
Late last year, other US officials said the assessments by the Pentagon team suggested that the Centennial Correctional Facility in Colorado is a more suitable site to send detainees whom officials believe should never be released.
Members of Congress have been demanding the Guantanamo plan for months, but those representing South Carolina, Kansas and Colorado have voiced opposition to housing the detainees in their states.
The administration is currently prohibited by law from moving Guantanamo Bay detainees to the United States. Mr Obama has long opposed that prohibition and the White House has not ruled out the possibility that the president may attempt to close the prison through executive action.
Advocates of closing Guantanamo say the prison has long been a recruiting tool for militant groups and that holding extremists suspected of violent acts indefinitely without charges or trial sparks anger and dismay among US allies.
Opponents say moving the detainees will not eliminate that problem.
There are currently 91 detainees at Guantanamo Bay, of whom 35 are expected to be transferred out by this summer to other countries.
The rest are either facing trial by military commission or have been determined to be too dangerous to release but are not facing charges. Some cannot be charged because of insufficient evidence and some may face future prosecution or have been designated for indefinite detention under the international laws of war.
Seven detainees are in the early stages of trial by military commission, including the five men accused of planning and aiding the September 11 terrorist attack, and three have been convicted and are serving sentences.
At its peak in 2003, Guantanamo held nearly 680 detainees, and there were about 245 when Mr Obama took office.
Speaking to reporters at the White House, Mr Obama said: "I don't want to pass this problem on to the next president, whoever it is. Are we going to let this linger on for another 15 years?
"Keeping this facility open is contrary to our values. It undermines our standing in the world. It is viewed as a stain on our broader record of upholding the highest standards of rule of law."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here